
Maybe the factors behind the neglect of this really vital thought,had been two good reasons. To begin with, it is a terrifying concept, all the hopes of conserving civilization, centered on the potential of new Engineering to do the work, and the 2nd reason is that the Club of Rome (the group who issued a book),did not give solid evidence to confirming it.
This thought is 1 of the most tough philosophical concerns,and it is central to the issue of the collapse of modern day civilization Perhaps the Club of Rome primarily based their expectations on some essential assumptions, this kind of as, the probability of failure to obtain the conserving technological developments, in time, provided the anticipated imminence of the collapse, but if we desired this concept to be established on solid theoretical bases, it is inevitable to go into the depths of philosophy.
I do not want to go, in this book, in the depth of this troublesome topic, but I will test to simplify the thought, so that the interested reader, would discover the basis for researches.
Technological innovation is the application of the laws of the theory in science, and as a result, if we want to solution the query: "What are the limits of Technological innovation?" We ought to To start with solution the query: "What are the limits of science?"
Researchers in the area of theoretical physicists had been attempting,for a number of decades, to attain a theory they phone, "theory of all forces" or "theory of almost everything", 1 of the well known researchers identified for their dedication to this test, was Albert Einstein, these attempts usually means implicitly anticipate that there are limits to the theoretical know-how, but theoretical physicists,did not frequently rely on philosophical basis to assistance this trend,and most of these attempts had been established only on the individual perceptions of the chance of reaching this ambitious aim. These attempts stay incomplete and the background of science provides us examples of the stages of preceding science, in which researchers idea they had previously reached these final limits of science, Probably the most famed of these historical stages was the stage in the end of the nineteenth century. Immediately after the theory of Max effectively about the electromagnetic waves and earlier than the explosion of the suggestions of quantum and relativity, at the starting of the twentieth century.
But philosophical considering requires one other program, the Dialectical materialism of the Marxism confirms that there are no limits to science, and in this trend it is followed by most modern-day philosophies.
It is quite critical to note that the introduction of the concept of infinite expertise, in fact, does not solve the concern of an imminent collapse of civilization, but only puts it in another kind. The conserving technological achievements, which are even now desired pretty soon, if brought in remarkable intensity, the outcome will be that the query will transform from "the collapse of civilization" to "the collapse of the image that we know, or that we may perhaps consider for civilization", and this outcome does not differ. In fact, from the earlier one particular, as it, in each instances, all issues connected to our present existence, will end, the validity of this outcome,was authorized by the American thinker Francis Fukuyama, in 1993, the credit for the courage,wherever the thought was incompatible with his famed thought of the "end of historical past", which was in the height of acceptance at that time.
On the other hand, the adoption of the notion of restricted information, obviously, settle the issue in favor of the strategy of the collapse of civilization.
Please see my web site: http://magdyhalim.blogspot.com/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar